![]() ![]() Unfortunately, in ES mono-speed are the rule. AS has a great experience on 2-speed and variable-speed pumps. I dont know why, maybe because we mainly use depurated water to fill our pools, or the contruction materials of the pools (in Spain a great ammount of pools are little sqare mosaic glass, and here I can see something like 'plast'). In this forum there are more focus on TA and CH, that are considered "very stables" in ES, so they are tested once a year and manually corrected if necesary. Here seems more important sanitize than filter. time of filtering is more important in "european school" (ES) than "american school" (AS): with 30✬ we have daily cicles of 3 times recirculation time (12-15 hours is usual with high temps). But all what I have been learned is from "spanish school", that seems a little diferent to american methods. I am not an experienced pool user (five years ago I didnt know what 'skimmer' was). I am interested in ORP but am still weighing the pros/cons of even attempting to try something (although I will definitely go for pH monitor/control eventually) Here is one thread I've been following where there has been some ORP success. ![]() ![]() It seems that many more Europeans use ORP, but it is not clear how easy/maintainable it is. Not many people are successful in applying it to this site's priority (free chlorine). Most interesting to me about your project is your success and/or problems with ORP. I don't know if you have read this forum's guidelines for pool is built on a system that uses free chlorine to keep your pool sanitary, filter time really doesn't have a defined role. The chip I am using (particle.io Photon) has its unique processes to help in doing those. Alarms, notifications are really important to me also. I've found (since my project is just for me), that it will never be cost effective because of all the time I've spent on it (haha). I don't think your goals are very different from other projects I have seen. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |